Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ed P's avatar

Friggin phenomenal reporting. Bravo.

A couple points of clarification would be helpful tho -

How many of the 20 of 24 “Injustice” Dem candidates that won primaries ended up winning their general elections? How might this have impacted the general election races? Or in other words, how might this strategy have performed overall to help shape the House from a purely D vs R perspective? (It is notable some D strategy this past cycle was to do the opposite and try to get MAGA candidates past primaries into general elections in order to defeat them. But I wonder if progressives might have fared better than centrists in these districts?)

Is any of this activity illegal?

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Jim Neal's avatar

Fantastic reporting. You put the pieces together in a cogent fashion. The oppo spending versus leftist candidates was never about crypto or the pandemic: it was all about protecting Congressional support for Israel. The centrist IE group NoLabels plays the same game: supporting “bipartisanship” with the caveat that all those supported are pro-Israel. It’s a ruse, and it’s clever.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts